I still remember his condescending smile. The drawings were no doubt fussy and immature, different from what was developing in his helpful class, but mostly he didn't think my subject matter was worthy of art. He didn't respect illustration as a profession. In so many words he asked me if I wouldn't rather be a real artist. "Not really," I thought. I felt embarrassed and emptied as I left his office. There were no illustration classes at my college anyway.
Too bad, huh? Though even if he had respected illustration as a legitimate way for artists to spend their time and had said something constructive, I might not have been able to go anywhere with it at that point because although I respected illustration as worthy of artists, I couldn't respect myself as an artist for a very long stretch of time. I got help with that later, and now I am well established on an exciting journey that makes me feel young and ambitious. Maybe that's something people my age don't always get to feel.
Here's a smudgy, charcoal self-portrait from my college days. I was wearing glasses which had fallen halfway down my nose, but they seem to have worn almost completely away.
Soon after I graduated, one Halloween our pastor asked everyone who wanted to make a picture of a saint for All Saints Day (the day that Halloween, All Hallows Eve, is the eve of). I did this St. Francis painting super fast, for me. I should have done something like that every day!
I think I did this iris around the same time. I bought it at a florist shop--which is how it can have a forsythia blossom in the same composition. For some reason I cut this bit out of the larger composition. I was probably having trouble getting the yellow right in the forsythias. The water damage is interesting, I think
.
Angels in one form or another have fascinated me for a long time, This week's Illustration Friday prompt is "light" so I think I'll post this over there.
Sorry that happened to you then. God knows, I guess, the best timing, and I think probably having children was your first proper preoccupation, and a fitting subject matter for your illustration gifts. Thinking of Eloise Wilkin, Mary Cassatt and all the other great women artists whose gifts seemed to sparkle out from contact with children either as aunts or as mothers....Your pictures have more joy in them now :) Blessings on your work, in Jesus, MB
ReplyDeleteYes, there are several ways that having children has made me a better artist. And about that incident--I don't think it was deeply wounding and I don't know that a different answer from him would have made a real difference in my trajectory. His thought process is and was unfathomable to me, though. He was a fine artist but he didn't make a living at it. He taught. I never wanted to teach art. I don't see what's so bad about being a professional illustrator to make money. Not that I've done it.
DeleteKeep up the good work! All I can say is; draw and paint more. It is mileage you need, like training for a race.
ReplyDeleteThank you, and I will!
DeleteMelissa, I think mid-life is a great time to re-ignite old pursuits or even learn new ones! I've been dabbling more and more with teaching drama and directing kids in plays and shows. It's a lot of time, but it feels like such a sweet spot for me, tying to together my administrative and artistic gifts, pulling in my literature and writing background, as well as my education degree. Yet I'm afraid it seems like a frivolous use of my time to others. I have been blessed by your blog posts and your journey! ~Jeanne
ReplyDeleteOh, Jeanne, don't let the suspicion or reality of improper judgments by others get you down or put you off course! If it's good for kids to be creative, it's good for grownups to use their creative gifts too. If it's too frivolous for grownups then it's too frivolous for kids. I think it's a great thing for our kids to see us developing and investing our talents, because the arts matter at every stage of life. If they don't see us using our gifts that way, when they grow up they will think they shouldn't either and the arts become devalued as only legit for kids and professional geniuses.
DeleteThanks for the encouragement, Jeanne!
Considering how long commercial art has been a thing, and how traditional painting originally wasn't even considered proper art, it's weird how some parts of the art world can be so snobby ... Snobbery is everywhere, I know, but still one would think (or hope) that the arts would be more embracing. Ick. Anyway, Super nice post! And I agree about the water damage - unexpected presents are the best ;)
ReplyDeleteIt is weird--so irrational. That's interesting about painting not being considered proper art. I didn't know that. I'll have to find out more. Thanks for stopping by, Nancy.
ReplyDelete